Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Energy Explorer's avatar

Thank you Gerard, good points which resonate with what we're read in the media in the last few weeks. I would however nuance your final mantra, "compete, baby, compete". The Draghi has successfully stressed this last point to increase European efficiency and productivity, but I would be careful in an energy context.

Europe needs competitive industries, indeed, but it also desperately needs state-driven investments to support this industry: grid infrastructure is the first one that comes to mind. And here we are talking about natural monopolies, which NEED to by highly regulated and are not exposed to the rules of the market.

And even for competitive markets, massive subsidies will be needed to get the ball rolling, for example in industry electrification. Solar and batteries are following nice Business 101 S-shaped adoption curves (rather exponential at the moment), but let's not forget this was all started by massive subsidy programs.

Europe's goal shouldn't be to just replace Chinese or American goods with European goods by copying one economic model or the other. It must first figure out what model it wants to apply itself to achieve a sustainable society (and not just random "Sustainability Goals" decided with a hammer).

Expand full comment
Rod H's avatar

NetZero is a fantasy…VRE unfortunately cannot replace thermal generation.

After 20 years and £bazillions, lil ol’ UK, emitting less than 1% of global CO2, still cannot retire any firm generators, and is dependent upon imports to keep from blacking out.

For their trouble, they now have the highest power prices in Europe, and are rapidly deindustrializing due to the high prices.

There’s still never been a successful demonstration of grid-scale non-dispatchable power.Keeping adding more VRE is madness.

And, there are no viable plans to power the world without hydrocarbons - save nuclear power.

NetZero is dead.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts